BALANCING SERUM
$ 35.5
INGREDIENTS
“Grape Seed (Vitus Vinifera) Oil*
Jojoba (Simmondsia Chinensis) Oil*
Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) Oil*
Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) Oil*
Frankincense (Boswellia frereana) Oil*
Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica) Oil*
Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) Oil*
Tea Tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) Oil*
PROS
- Contains grape seed and jojoba oil, which are lightweight and non-comedogenic.
- Provides an initially clarifying and aromatic effect.
- Free from synthetic preservatives, silicones, and PEGs.
CONS
- High concentration of essential oils (eucalyptus, rosemary, tea tree, frankincense) — all known irritants with sensitization potential.
- May cause barrier erosion and increased reactivity with long-term use.
- Lacks humectants or ceramides to replenish moisture or strengthen the barrier.
- Not suitable for sensitive, rosacea-prone, or acneic skin.
BEST FOR SKIN TYPE
None recommended for consistent use. May be tolerated by resilient, non-reactive, or oily skin types for occasional spot application but not for daily use.
FINAL VERDICT
Despite its natural appeal, Vika’s Essentials Balancing Serum contains an excessive concentration of essential oils that make it incompatible with Functional Beauty standards for long-term skin health. While it may offer short-term clarity or aromatic satisfaction, its cumulative risk of irritation and barrier disruption outweighs any benefits. Over time, even non-sensitive individuals may develop reactivity or chronic inflammation from such blends.
PRODUCT NAME
BALANCING SERUM
BRAND NAME
VIKA’S ESSENTIALS
STAR RATING
QUICK VERDICT:
Vika’s Essentials Balancing Serum, despite its natural appeal, contains high levels of essential oils that pose a long-term risk of irritation and barrier disruption, making it incompatible with Functional Beauty standards for sustained skin health.
Affiliate disclaimer: When you make a purchase through retailer links on our site, we may earn commission through affiliate programs to support our work. Learn more here
Product Review and discussion.
Subscribe
0 Opinion
Oldest
